A Systematic Review of Usability Studies in Augmented Reality between 2005 and 2014
Arindam Dey, Mark Billinghurst, Robert W. Lindeman, and J. Edward Swan II. A Systematic Review of Usability Studies in Augmented Reality between 2005 and 2014. In Adjunct Proceedings, IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR 2016), pp. 49–50, Sep 2016. DOI: 10.1109/ISMAR-Adjunct.2016.0036.
Download
Abstract
Augmented Reality (AR) interfaces have been studied extensively over the last few decades, with a growing number of user-based experiments. In this paper, we systematically review most AR papers published between 2005 and 2014 that include user studies. A total of 291 papers have been reviewed and classified based on their application areas. The primary contribution of the review is to present the broad landscape of user-based AR research, and to provide a high-level view of how that landscape has changed. We also identify areas where there have been few user studies, and opportunities for future research. This poster describes the methodology of the review and the classifications of AR research that have emerged.
BibTeX
@InProceedings{ISMAR16-slr,
author = {Arindam Dey and Mark Billinghurst and Robert
W. Lindeman and J. Edward {Swan~II}},
title = {A Systematic Review of Usability Studies in Augmented
Reality between 2005 and 2014},
booktitle = {Adjunct Proceedings, IEEE International Symposium on
Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR 2016)},
location = {Merida, Mexico},
date = {September 19--23},
month = {Sep},
year = 2016,
pages = {49--50},
note = {DOI: <a target="_blank"
href="https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR-Adjunct.2016.0036">10.1109/ISMAR-Adjunct.2016.0036</a>.},
abstract = {
Augmented Reality (AR) interfaces have been studied extensively over
the last few decades, with a growing number of user-based
experiments. In this paper, we systematically review most AR papers
published between 2005 and 2014 that include user studies. A total of
291 papers have been reviewed and classified based on their
application areas. The primary contribution of the review is to
present the broad landscape of user-based AR research, and to provide
a high-level view of how that landscape has changed. We also identify
areas where there have been few user studies, and opportunities for
future research. This poster describes the methodology of the review
and the classifications of AR research that have emerged.
},
}